City Web Page Part II
July 22, 2005 letter sent to the news media.
The CC Civic Association was in the news this week as a result of city council's action to specifically remove Civic from being listed on the city's web site under “local organizations.” Civics’ position has always been that only governmental entities should be linked to our taxpayer funded city web site. Civic does not believe that its web site www.capecoralcivicassociation.org or any other non-governmental entity should be linked to the city web site nor did we ask to be listed in the first place.
That being said, on Monday, July 18, a majority of city council exercised its power to remove Cape Coral's oldest civic organization from the city's web page. You might ask why?
According to council member Boyd, he doesn't believe any person or group having “opinions” (contrary to his) should be allowed to link to the city web page. Council member Tim Day said; “only one group comes to mind” and he then proceeded to make outrageously false claims about the content of Civic publications as a basis for his actions. Others in support of this action were council members Bertolini, Jeffers and Rosado who said; “anyone critical of council needs to be penalized.” Prior to the vote, council member Stevens asked if the motion was to be “that discriminatory” to only remove Civic. Boyd’s response was yes.
Civic has long monitored local government policies, issues and the votes of our elected officials. Most of what is printed in its Chatline newsletter (printed for the benefit of our members) is nothing more than a report of council member votes or an account of their behavior during public meetings. If the elected officials don't like what they are reading then maybe what they are admitting is they don't like seeing the things they have done, in print. Since the opinion or account of council's action in this letter is to appear in the news media (as are many opinions, editorials and political cartoons) does this suggest that the city web page needs to remove its link to the media as well? Of course not, or then again, maybe so according to the rationale of some elected officials.
How many times have you heard it said; “I may not like what you have to say, but I will defend your right to say it?” This is what our democracy is all about. It is the very foundation of this nation and it is contained in our first amendment as freedom of speech. It is obvious that a majority of the elected body is sensitive to what is written about them, but rather than defend the principles that this nation was founded upon they chose to act in a vindictive, prejudicial and discriminatory manner. Remember, only Civic was removed. Remember the basis for removal is that a majority doesn't like what Civic has to say about them. I can only conclude that the majority on council are either ignorant of their oath of office, that includes defending the United States Constitution, or they have preference for third world thinking. We wonder who will be next on council's hit list?
nfortunately for the citizens of Cape Coral these are the officials we’ve elected to serve and defend our rights. Fortunately Cape citizens still have Civic to monitor and report on your city government and the behavior, comments and decisions of your elected officials. Public officials place themselves in the public eye, opening themselves to both criticism and praise. And then they have the nerve to cry when the public voices an opinion. Go figure!
Ralph LePera
2 Comments:
Mail bag News-Press July 24
Assault on free speech
The actions against the Cape Coral Civic Association by certain members of the council this week were prejudicial, biased and an outright vendetta against free speech. This has the potential for legal ramifications with the taxpayer footing the bill.
Councilmen Boyd, Jeffers, Day, Rosado and Councilwoman Bertolini singled out the Cape Coral Civic Association for removal of their link on the city's Web site and that was shameful and clearly a vote against free speech!
What will they do next? There was no discussion of the many Web sites that are linked to the city's Web site that would give you pause. The list of links that were not discussed is amazing with the following being a few:
FamilySearch, FreeCreditReport, Dating, Christian Singles, Foreclosures, Cell Phones, Banks, Shelter For Women And Children, Austin Texas Baby Care Centers, Business Opportunities, Fastest Growing Cities, Hotels, Seattle, American Cities, Divorce Papers, Car Insurance, Mortgage, Business Opportunities, Life Insurance, Work from Home, Leisure, Music, Jewish Singles, Real Estate Training, Weight Loss, Alcohol Treatment and MCSE Certification.
Is this the action of mature, sound, reasoning elected officials or is this the actions of a like minded group, who are bent on carrying out a political vendetta with denial of free speech, simply because they have the votes to do whatever it is they please? I think the answer is quite clear.
Civic publishes a monthly newsletter that at times calls some members of the council to task, on actions they have taken. Obviously these Council persons do not like being called to task or having their actions exposed. It is abundantly clear they will do whatever it takes to prevent criticism of their action from being viewed by the residents of Cape Coral et. al.
The Cape Coral Civic Association predates the incorporation of the city and was instrumental in its incorporation! Civic has a proud history of bringing vital issues to the citizens of Cape Coral.
If anyone wishes to see what Civic publishes in its newsletter or on its Web site, simply go to http://www.capecoralcivicassociation.org/ and see for yourself. You be the judge. Let your elected officials know how you feel about their actions.
LYNN ROSKO, Cape Coral
Mail bag News-Press July 24
Impartial Web links
The Cape Coral City Council's decision to remove the Cape Coral Civic Association from its Web site links for the reasons indicated by the council leaves much to be desired as to the integrity of the city council.
Councilman Boyd stated that opinion columns have no place on the city's site and expressed concerns about objectionable material being available on the site.
I am not a member of the Cape Coral Civic Association, but I have at times sat in on their interesting debates.
It would be nice to have only favorable information concerning the city of Cape Coral on the Internet, but in all fairness to the citizens, it is not justified and tantamount to a violation of first Amendment Rights to free speech.
We want to entice people to this area but we should be impartial as to what appears on the link.
JULES A. CIBELLI, Cape Coral
Post a Comment
<< Home